Calcutta High Court
CRM(A)/490/2026 of SUSHANTA SARKAR Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 22 July 2026
SL No.9 Court No.11 (gc) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
22.07.2026
SL No.9
Court No.11
(gc)
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRM (A) 490 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No.602 of 2025
dated 04.07.2025 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 of the NDPS.
And
In the matter of : Sushanta Sarkar
- Petitioner.
Mr. Bipul Ranjan Bhattacharjee,
Mr. Subhash Ch. Roy,
Ms. Tithi Banik
….For the Petitioner.
Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Ld. APP,
Mr. Raj Kumar Mitra,
Ms. Madhushri Dutta,
… For the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No.602 of 2025 dated July 4, 2025 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 of the NDPS Act.
2. The petitioner submits that the contraband material was not recovered from his person and he has been falsely implicated. It is submitted that all the co-accused have been granted bail.
3. Learned Advocate for the State submits that 43.730 Kg ganja was recovered from the house of the petitioner.
4. Considering the records and the case diary, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
2
6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)