Calcutta High Court
CRM(A)/478/2026 of DIPAK ROY Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 21 July 2026
Court No.11 (GB) (Allowed) Calcutta High Court In the
21.07.2026
Item No.13
Court No.11
(GB)
(Allowed)
Calcutta High Court
In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
CRM (A) 478 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under section Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. 2023, in connection with G.R. Case No. 355 of 2023 arising out of Sahebganj Police Station Case No.257 of 2023 dated 07.07.2023
under Sections 448/323/325/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1-A)/27/35 of the Arms Act.
And
In the matter of: Dipak Roy
….Petitioner.
Ms. Rima Sarkar,
Mr. Sudip Banerjee
…for the Petitioner.
Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Ld. APP.,
Ms. Panchali Deb Sikder (Nag),
Mr. Shyamal Barman
… for the State.
Mr. Sudhindra Das
… for the De facto complainant.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail. This is the second application.
2. Ms. Sarkar, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that there has been changed circumstance, which entitles the petitioner to pray for pre-arrest bail.
3. The notice was served upon the de facto complainant. The de facto complainant appears through her learned advocate and she is also personally present in Court. She submits that the complaint was lodged falsely. She was not aware of the contents. She was asked to sign on a blank paper.
4. Under such circumstances, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed.
5. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the
2 BNSS. The petitioner will not leave the jurisdictional police station and cooperate with the investigation. He will meet the investigating officer once a fortnight. In the event the condition is violated, the anticipatory bail will stand automatically cancelled.
6. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 478 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of.
7. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)