Calcutta High Court
CRM(A)/424/2026 of SEKH FARHAN ALAM@SEKH FARHAN MAHAFUZ Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 21 July 2026
11 SL No.02 Cp CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
21.07.2026 Ct. No. 11 SL No.02 Cp
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRM (A) No. 424 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. 2023, in connection with Matigara Police Station Case No.683 of 2025, dated 26.10.2025 corresponding to PTN No. 5115/2025, under Section 64 of the BNS, 2023. And
In the matter of: Sekh Farhan Alam @ Sekh Farhan Mahafuz
….Petitioner.
Mr. Rajdeep Das …for the Petitioner.
Mr. Avrojyoti Das Mr. Gobinda Ghosh Mr. Atul Dong
… for the State.
The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail on the ground that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case under Section 64 of the BNS, 2023. The petitioner and the victim were in a love relationship. The relationship did not work out and the complaint was lodged falsely, out of vengeance. I have considered the case diary and the medical report. The offending vehicle was subsequently seized by the police in an abandoned condition. Thus, the seizure of the vehicle led to filing of the supplementary charge-sheet. Considering the seriousness of the allegation and the records, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, dismissed. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)