Calcutta High Court

CRM(A)/423/2026 of MANOJ RAHA Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri 20.07.2026 Item No.11 Court No.11

Calcutta High Court

In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri

20.07.2026

Item No.11

Court No.11

(GB)

CRM (A) 423 of 2026

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

And

In the matter of: Manoj Raha

….Petitioner.

Mr. Subham Ghosh,

Mr. Mayank Roy,

Mr. Hasanur Rahaman

…for the Petitioner.

Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Ld. PP.,

Mr. Raj Kumar Mitra,

Mr. Debabrata Rai

… for the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The investigating officer was directed to submit a report with regard to the physical possession of the vehicle as on date of alleged occurrence of the offence, that is, on August 26, 2025.

2. Today, the investigating officer has filed a report and it appears that the ARTO, Siliguri stated in his letter that the application with regard to the transfer of the ownership of the concerned vehicle was initiated in favour of the petitioner on August 24, 2025 as per Vahan-4 Data and the fees against such application was also deposited on August 25, 2025.

3. The petitioner had raised an objection for being arraigned as an accused, on the ground that he was not the owner of the vehicle and, as such, the seizure of the contraband substance from the driver of

2 the vehicle could not be connected to any involvement of the petitioner in this case.

4. Admittedly, commercial quantity of contraband material was seized. The application for transfer of ownership of the vehicle was initiated in favour of the petitioner on August 24, 2025. The statement of the accused/driver, prima facie, indicates the involvement of the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Bhaktinagar Police Station Case No.854 of 2025 dated August 26, 2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/25 of the NDPS Act, 1985, is rejected.

6. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead