Calcutta High Court
CRM(A)/430/2026 of ADITYA@ANAND VISAL @ ANAND VISHAL Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 20 July 2026
SL No.15 Court No.11 (gc) (Allowed) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH
20.07.2026
SL No.15
Court No.11
(gc)
(Allowed)
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRM (A) 430 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Jaldhaka Police Station Case No.50 of 2014
dated 28.09.2014 under Sections 363/365/109 of the Indian Penal Code.
And
In the matter of : Aditya @ Anand Visal @ Anand Vishal
- Petitioner.
Mr. Ujjwal Luksom,
Mr. Satrughan Gupta,
Mr. Sandipan Das
….For the Petitioner.
Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Ld. APP,
Mr. Atul Dong
… For the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Jaldhaka Police Station Case No.50 of 2014 dated September 28, 2014 of the Indian Penal Code. C.R. case was filed by one Sri Sanjay Kumar. The allegation against the petitioner was that, the complainant’s wife used to speak to the petitioner and as such, the petitioner could be connected with the disappearance of the wife, child and the niece. Records reveal that the lady reunited with her husband after two weeks along with the child and the niece.
2. Having considered the statement of the niece recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I am of the view
2 that, anticipatory bail can be granted. In any event, the investigation is complete.
3. Accordingly, this Court directs that, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023. The petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional court on the dates fixed by the learned Court. The petitioner shall not enter Jaldhaka, except for the purpose of attending Court. He will not contact with the complainant’s wife or intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.
4. In default, the jurisdictional court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference to this court.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)