Armed Forces Tribunal

Order dated 23-01-2024 MA-45/2023 on 23 January 2024

4.

UOI & Otherrs

Ex-Nk (TS) Tinklho Lal

Respondents

CORAM :

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL,

REGIONAL BENCH, GUWAHATI

23.01.2024

MA-45/2023

With MA-46/23 (AO0 OA-52/2019)

-Versus

MA 45 and 46 of OA 52/2019

Applicant

By legal practitioners for Applicant

PK Garodia, CGSC

Respondents

By legal practitioner for

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY, MEMBER (J)

HON BLE AIR MSHL BALAKRISHNAN SURESH, MEMBER (A)

AR Tahbildar

ORDER

( DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY, MEMBER(J)) This order shall dispose of both the applications filed for seeking leave to appeal against the order dated 06 April,2023 passed by this Bench in Original Application No. 52 of 2019 allowing thereby the same after taking into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The delay of 208 days as occurred in filing the application for seeking leave to appeal is neither inordinate nor deliberate and rather stands satisfactorily explained. Therefore, the same is ordered to be condoned.

Page 1 of 2

However, coming to the application filed for seeking leave to file Appeal , the order sought to be appealed repeals that while deciding the Ordinal Application, the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court on the point in IsSue has been taken into consideration. Otherwise also, the order sought to be appealed is neither perverse nor suffers from any infirmity as well as llegality. Even filing of the appeal in this case is also not in the interest of public at large. The prayer for seeking leave to appeal in this matter cannot be granted in view of the observations of the Hon'ble Apex Court in a recent order dated February 18,2022 passed in Civil Appeal Diary No (s) 122/2022 titled Union of India & Ors.Vs.No.2869930A Ex. Havildar Dhanbir Singh. This order reads as follows: - "The time has come that the authoriies of the appellant(s) must introspect and find out where the fault lies within themselves. At the same time, we would also like to observe that the employee who has left the services for more than two decades approach the Tribunal with his grievance for release of pensionary benefits inciuding disability pension.

3. The Triburnal with its consistent view, based on the precedents laid down by this Court has proceeded in granting legilimate reliel to the applicant(s). No one in the office of the authorities of the appellant(s) is examining as to whether it is a fit case for filing an appeal before this Court and samne is being filed invariably without default. The presernt one has been prelerred by the appellant(s) against the order of the Tribunal to which even on merits also, we find no justiicalion" The AFT Chandigarh Bench has also taken similar view of the matter in its recent order dated 26th April,2022 passed in MA No., 973 and 974 of 2021, filed for seeking leave to appeal, on condonation of delay against an order dated 23.09.2019, passed in OA No. 1406 of 2019 while placing reliance on a previous order dated 01.08.2016 again that of this Bench passed in MA No. 2199 and 2200 of 2016 (0A No. 1635 of 2014), titled Yashwant Singh Bharmouria Vs. Union of India & Others.

In view of the above, the application filed for condonation of delay is allowed, however, applicatiorn filed for seeking leave to appeal being devoid of any merits is dismissed. (Air Mshl Balakrishnan Suresh) Member (A) Mc/Gm (Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary) Member (J)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead