Calcutta High Court
CRM(NDPS)/14/2026 of LAKHINDRA ROY Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 23 March 2026
Court No.7 CHC (Rejected) Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side
23.03.2026
Item No.5
Court No.7
CHC
(Rejected)
Calcutta High Court
In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
Appellate Side
CRM(NDPS) 14 of 2026
In Re:- An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; in connection with Kharibari Police Station Case No.302/2025 dated 19.10.2025
under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
And
In the matter of : Lakhindra Roy
...… petitioner
Mr. Hillol Saha Podder, Advocate
…for the petitioner
Mr. Saikat Chatterjee, Advocate
Mr. Chattu Roy, Advocate
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Report as called for by the order dated March 17, 2026 filed in Court be taken on record.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, no recovery was made from the possession of the petitioner. There is no statement of co-accused implicating the petitioner. He draws the attention of the Court to the First Information Report and submits that, Pulak Das one of the coaccused stated that, the petitioner was there in the car because the petitioner traded in betel nuts.
3. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that, commercial quantity of contraband was seized from scooty belonging to a different person. Police on investigation found that, there are Call Details Record between the petitioner and some of the co-accused. He relies upon the Call Details Record in this regard.
4. Initially, one person was arrested with commercial quantity of contraband. Such person is Bapi Sekh. Police conducted investigation. Names of Pulak Das, petitioner and Alok Das came up. Police considered the Call Details Record of these three persons. Police found on investigation that, these three persons were in contact with each other. Presence of the petitioner in the locality is also established by the Call Details Record.
5. Apparently, petitioner is one of the persons who was to receive the contraband.
6. In view of the nexus being shown through the Call Details Record between the petitioner and the co-accused in relation to the commercial quantity of contraband seized, I am not in a position to return a finding that, the petitioner is able to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985.
7. Consequently, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
8. CRM (NDPS) 14 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)