Calcutta High Court

CRM(NDPS)/218/2026 of SAHAJAN @ SAHANAJ ALI MONDAL Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 20 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 04 S.D. (Bail allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT

20.03.2026

Serial no. 04

S.D.

(Bail allowed)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CRM(NDPS)/218/2026

In re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sahebganj Police Station Case No. 311 of 2025 dated 04.06.2025 under Section 21(C )/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

-And-

In the matter of: Sahajan @ Sahanaj Ali Mondal

… … Petitioner

Dr. Arjun Chowdhury,

Ms. Pratusha Dutta Chowdhury

Ms. Riya Agarwal

Mr. Mantu Mandal

Mr. Bappaditya Roy, Advocates

… … For the Petitioner

Mr. Nilay Chakraborty, Ld. A.P.P.

Mr. Ujjwal Luksom

Mr. Tapan Bhattacharjee, Advocates

… …For the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioner prays for bail.

2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner draws the attention of the Court to paragraph 11 of the charge sheet submitted. He submits that, in the charge sheet it is alleged as against the petitioner that the commercial quantity of contraband seized belonged to one person and that one of accomplishes of such person is the petitioner.

3. The contraband was seized from a vehicle. Vehicle does not belong to the petitioner. Petitioner was not arrested along with the contraband.

4. Petitioner is sought to be roped into the police case on the basis of statement made by a co-accused while in custody. Court’s attention is not drawn to any evidence implicating

2 the petitioner with the seized commercial quantity of contraband.

5. In such circumstances, the Court is of the view that the petitioner is able to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

6. Consequently, petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge under NDPS Act, Cooch Behar. The petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

7. In the event, the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the bail without further reference to this Court.

8. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

9. CRM(NDPS)/218/2026 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead