Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/43/2026 of SOURAV MINJ Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 19 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 10 S.D. (Bail allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH

19.03.2026

Serial no. 10

S.D.

(Bail allowed)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CRM(M)/43/2026

In re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with SC 07 of 2024

(P) arising out of Mal Police Station Case No. 25 of 2024 dated 11.01.2024 under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

-And-

In the matter of : SOURAV MINJ

… … Petitioner

Mr. Anirban Banerjee,

Mr. Swarup Mandal Advocates

… … For the Petitioner

Mr. Abhijit Sarkar

Mr. Subhasish Misra, Advocates

… …For the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioner prays for bail on the ground of parity with the co- accused who was granted bail by the Coordinate Bench on December 18, 2025 passed in C.R.M. (M) 334 of 2025.

2. Petitioner is in custody in excess of 708 days. Charge sheet was submitted on March 11, 2024. Charges are yet to be framed.

3. Coordinate Bench noted that the other co-accused was incarcerated for about 709 days and that despite the direction of Court, trial did not start.

4. In such circumstances on the ground of parity, petitioner is granted bail.

5. Accordingly, petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge

2 Special Court, (under POCSO Act), Additional Sessions Judge, Mal, Jalpaiguri subject to condition that the petitioner will, however, not enter into the jurisdiction of the local police station excepting for the purpose of reporting to the police station and for the purpose of appearing before the Court. The petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

6. In the event, the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the bail without further reference to this Court.

7. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

8. CRM(M)/43/2026 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead