Calcutta High Court
WPA/414/2026 of SANJEET SINGH Vs VIDYA SINGH AND OTHRS on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** WPA/414/2026 Sanjeet Singh Vs. Vidya Singh and Others Mr. Samson Stephen … for the petitioner [on behalf of Mr. G.B.Kumar] Ms. K. Sneha … for the respondent no.1 Ms. Babita Das … for the respondent nos. 2&3 October
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
***
WPA/414/2026
Sanjeet Singh
Vs.
Vidya Singh and Others
Mr. Samson Stephen
… for the petitioner
[on behalf of Mr. G.B.Kumar]
Ms. K. Sneha
… for the respondent no.1
Ms. Babita Das
… for the respondent nos. 2&3
October 5, 2026
[SR]
Item No.4
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The respondent no.1 was the applicant before the Maintenance Tribunal complaining violation of Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 by the petitioner.
2. The respondent no.2 thus instituted a proceeding in this regard bearing F.No.1-4/AC(R&DM)/SCWMT/DM/R-Cell/ 2026/1632 wherein direction was issued to the writ petitioner and his wife to vacate the residential structure situated at the survey No.41/2/4 and hand over the vacant possession to the respondent no.1. The order of the respondent no.2 is dated 03.08.2026.
3. The order was put to challenge by the son (writ petitioner) alleging that the order was not preceded by an opportunity to the petitioner and therefore unsustainable.
4. When the matter was taken upon on 02.09.2026, learned advocate representing the parties expressed their agreement to explore the possibility of an amicable resolution of the dispute through the process of mediation. The matter thereafter was referred to a trained Mediator by an order of this Court dated 02.09.2026.
5. The learned Mediator’s report was forwarded to the State Legal Services Authority by a communication dated 25.09.2026, recording that the mediation was successful and that the parties have arrived at full and final settlement of the dispute on the terms and conditions recorded therein.
6. The matter having settled by a Mediated Settled Agreement between the parties, learned advocates representing the parties are ad idem that nothing survives in the present writ petition.
7. The report of the Mediator produced in Court be taken on record.
8. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
9. Parties would be at liberty to obtain and rely upon certified copy of the Mediator’s report.
10. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Madhuresh Prasad, J. )