Calcutta High Court

WPA/357/2026 of SHRI.C.AJAIYA KUMAR Vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANR on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** WPA/357/2026 Shri C. Ajaiya Kumar Vs The Superintending Engineer and another Mr. U.Partha Sarathi … for the petitioner Mr. S.C.Mishra … for the respondents September 29, 2026 [SR] Item No.10 1. The supplementary affidavit has

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]

***

WPA/357/2026

Shri C. Ajaiya Kumar

Vs

The Superintending Engineer and another

Mr. U.Partha Sarathi

… for the petitioner

Mr. S.C.Mishra

… for the respondents

September 29, 2026

[SR]

Item No.10

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The supplementary affidavit has been filed by the respondent no.2 based on the records maintained in the office of the respondents. It is submitted that he does not wish to press the averments made in paragraphs 5, 6 and 9 of the affidavit-in-opposition.

2. The supplementary affidavit was filed since averments were made in the affidavit-in-opposition that the petitioner did not supply a valid, correctly formatted, and verified affidavit, as well as necessary identity documents (Aadhaar Card) required for providing electrical connection on the encroached lands. Similar averments made as regards the other regulatory requirements.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would ensure compliance with requisites in terms of Clause 5.30, (7) and (8) of the Supply Code, 2018.

4. Considering the rival submissions, since the parties are ad idem on the issue that the compliance with 5.30 (7)(8) is mandatory and pre-requisite for supply of electricity, this Court disposes of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to comply with the requirement applicable to the petitioner under clause 5.30 of the Supply Code, 2018. If the petitioner submits the requisite proof of occupancy/identity, the indemnity having already been submitted, the authority should consider the application and take a final decision expeditiously within four weeks thereafter.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of.

6. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

( Madhuresh Prasad, J. )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead