Calcutta High Court
WPA/441/2026 of MIRDULA DAS Vs THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (SAD) AND ANOTHER on 2 September 2026
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** WPA/441/2026 Mirdula Das Vs The Executive Engineer (SAD) and Another Mr. S. Golder … for the petitioner Mr. S.C.Mishra … for the respondents [through virtual mode] September 2,2026 [SR] Item No.11 1. The petitioner’s
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
***
WPA/441/2026
Mirdula Das
Vs
The Executive Engineer (SAD) and Another
Mr. S. Golder
… for the petitioner
Mr. S.C.Mishra
… for the respondents
[through virtual mode]
September 2,2026
[SR]
Item No.11
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner’s application seeking new electricity connection is being rejected on repeated occasions with the observation that all documents have not been filed at the time of making the application.
2. It has been categorically submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that all documents required for consideration of his application are annexed with the writ petition. The entire copy of the sale agreement is annexed from pages 15 to 28 of the writ petition.
3. Prayer has been made to direct the respondents to consider the application made by the petitioner.
4. Learned advocate representing the Electricity Department submits, upon instruction, that incomplete sale agreement has been submitted by the petitioner. Pages 5 and 6 of the sale agreement were not submitted before the authority.
5. It appears from the documents annexed to the writ petition that the petitioner approached the Court on an earlier occasion by filing a writ petition being WPA/473/2025 which stood disposed of on 03.11.2025 by noticing the remark of rejection of the petitioner’s application and by directing the petitioner to file a fresh application in the prescribed format along with all necessary documents.
6. As the learned advocate for the petitioner asserts that all documents required for consideration of the application are annexed to the writ petition, accordingly, the competent authority of the Electricity Department is directed to take into consideration the documents annexed to the writ petition for the purpose of considering the petitioner’s application seeking fresh electricity connection.
7. Apart from the documents, which are already annexed to the petition, if any further documents are required, the same shall be made known to the petitioner.
8. A decision upon consideration of all relevant documents shall be taken at the earliest but positively within a period of four weeks from date. The fate of the petitioner’s application shall be made known to her.
9. The writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
10. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Amrita Sinha, J. )