Calcutta High Court

WPA/419/2026 of RAFAT JAN Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** WPA/419/2026 Rafat Jan Vs The Deputy Commissioner and others Mr. N.A. Khan … for the petitioner Mr. V.D.Sivabalan … for the official respondents August 25,2026 [SR] Item No.2 1. The prayer of the petitioner for issuance of

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]

***

WPA/419/2026

Rafat Jan

Vs

The Deputy Commissioner and others

Mr. N.A. Khan

… for the petitioner

Mr. V.D.Sivabalan

… for the official respondents

August 25,2026

[SR]

Item No.2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The prayer of the petitioner for issuance of licence in respect of pre-1961 land bearing Survey No.1527/3 of approximately 812 sq.mtrs situated at Haddo (Anarkali)village is alleged to be pending consideration before the Assistant Commissioner (Settlement), South Andaman District since November, 2025.

2. None appears on behalf of the private respondent, despite service.

3. As it appears that the prayer of the petitioner is pending consideration before the Assistant Commissioner (Settlement), accordingly, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the writ petition pending.

4. The instant writ petition stands disposed of by directing the respondent no.2 being the Assistant Commissioner (Settlement), South Andaman District to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation received by the department on 03.11.2025 strictly, in accordance with law, after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties at the earliest, but positively within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order.A reasoned order shall be passed and communicated to all the parties.

5. If the prayer of the petitioner is allowed, necessary consequential steps shall be taken by the aforesaid respondent without any further delay.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the claim of the petitioner and all points are left open to be decided by the aforesaid respondent at the time of consideration of the said representation.

7. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the representation dated 03.11.2025 along with necessary supporting documents to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of this Court.

8. The writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

9. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Amrita Sinha, J. )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead