Calcutta High Court
CO/41/2026 of SMTI. KANCHAN MONDAL Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ORS. on 28 July 2026
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** CO/41/2026 Smti. Kanchan Mondal Vs. The Deputy Commissioner and others Mr. Prohit Mohan Lal … for the revisionist July 28, 2026 [SR] Item No.1 1. The revisionist claims inaction on the part of the respondent nos.1 and 2 who were not
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
[ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ]
***
CO/41/2026
Smti. Kanchan Mondal
Vs.
The Deputy Commissioner and others
Mr. Prohit Mohan Lal
… for the revisionist
July 28, 2026
[SR]
Item No.1
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The revisionist claims inaction on the part of the respondent nos.1 and 2 who were not parties to the suit in the Trial Court in effecting partition as per the final decree passed by the Trial Court.
2. Admittedly, a decree cannot be enforced or executed against the persons who were not parties to the suit or in the decree.
3. No relief can be granted to the revisionist against the respondent nos.1 and 2 in this petition. Hence, the application stands dismissed.
4. The dismissal of the instant revisional application shall not disentitle the applicant to take out other proceedings in accordance with law against the respondent nos.1 and 2.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )