Calcutta High Court

FMA/1/2026 of M/S SRI SAKTHI CORPORATION Vs THE PORT BLAIR MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR on 15 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** FMA/1/2026 IA No.CAN/1/2026 M/s Sri Sakthi Corporation Vs. The Port Blair Municipal Council and another Ms. Anjili Nag, Sr.Adv. Ms. Sohini Biswas … for the appellant Mr. Rakesh Kumar … for the respondents January 15, 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] ***

FMA/1/2026 IA No.CAN/1/2026

M/s Sri Sakthi Corporation

Vs.

The Port Blair Municipal Council and another Ms. Anjili Nag, Sr.Adv. Ms. Sohini Biswas

… for the appellant

Mr. Rakesh Kumar

… for the respondents January 15, 2026 [SR] Item No.5 This is an appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). The appeal arises out of an order passed in O.S.No.1 of 2026 by the learned District Judge in an application under section 9 of the 1996 Act. The appellant had moved the said application ex parte. After filing of the appeal, the respondents in the application under section 9 of the 1996 Act, being the respondents in the instant appeal, has appeared and entered appearance through an advocate.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the learned advocate for the appellant, on instructions, submits that the appellant is desirous to withdraw the appeal. We cannot stand in the way of the party withdrawing the appeal. However, on considering the object of the 1996 Act and the supremacy of the party autonomy, we are inclined to give directions for filing

2

affidavits before the trial court for hearing of the applications under section 9 of the 1996 Act.

Let affidavit-in-opposition be filed by the respondents by 6th February, 2026. Reply thereto, if any, be filed by 20th February, 2026. Let the section 9 application under 1996 Act be fixed on 25th February, 2026 before the learned District Judge, subject to his convenience. Let the parties communicate this order to the Court of learned District Judge by 20th February, 2026. The appeal and the connected application are disposed of with the aforesaid directions.

(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)

(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead