Calcutta High Court
ITAT/206/2026 of PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA Vs KANYA KUMARI PROPERTIES PVT LTD on 13 October 2026
17 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION [INCOME TAX] ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/206/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA VS KANYA KUMARI PROPERTIES PVT LTD BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
OD – 17 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION [INCOME TAX] ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT/206/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA VS KANYA KUMARI PROPERTIES PVT LTD
BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SUDIP DEB Date: 13th October, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. Mr. Sujit Mitra, Adv. …for appellant.
Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. [VC] Ms. Alisha Das, Adv. Ms. Rituparna Ghosh, Adv. Ms. Maitreyee Naskar, Adv. Ms. Vedika Agarwal, Adv. …for respondent.
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. There is a delay of 71 days in filing the appeal. We are satisfied with the explanation offered for not preferring the appeal within time. Therefore, the delay is condoned. The application being GA/1/2026 is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the tax effect in this case is Rs.28,38,938/- which is below the tax limit as prescribed in the CBDT Circular
No.9/2024 dated 17th September, 2024 and Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15th March, 2024 but the case falls within the exceptional category under para 3.1(h) as per CBDT Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15th March, 2024. We have perused the application, the assessment order, appellate order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax and the order of the learned Tribunal dated 25.11.2025 for the Assessment Year 2013-2014. We do not find any reason to entertain this appeal where the appellant has not clearly suggested which exceptional clause as read in para 3.1(h) as per CBDT Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15th March, 2024 is applicable in the present appeal. As such, this appeal and the connected application being GA/2/2026 are dismissed as the tax effect in this matter is below Rs. 2 crores.
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
(SUDIP DEB, J.) sd/