Calcutta High Court

CUSTA/74/2026 of COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT), KOLKATA Vs M/S GENERAL NICE MINERAL RESOURCES (INDIA) PVT.LTD. on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SHEET CUSTA/74/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT), KOLKATA VS M/S GENERAL NICE MINERAL RESOURCES (INDIA) PVT.LTD. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE SUDIP

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

OD 10 ORDER SHEET CUSTA/74/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT), KOLKATA VS M/S GENERAL NICE MINERAL RESOURCES (INDIA) PVT.LTD.

BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE SUDIP DEB Date: 12th October, 2026.

Appearance: Ms. Sretapa Sinha, Adv. . . .for the appellant.

The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant. There is a delay of 187 days in filing the appeal. We are satisfied with the explanation offered for not preferring the appeal within time. Therefore, the delay is condoned. The application being GA 1 of 2026 is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the monetary effect in this case is less than Rs.50 lakhs which is below the limit as prescribed in the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction under F. No.390/Misc./30/2023-JC dated 02.11.2023 but the case falls within the exceptional category under para 2 as per Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction dated 02.11.2023.

2 We have perused the application. We do not find any reason to entertain this appeal where the appellant has not clearly suggested which exceptional clause as read in para 2 as per Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction dated 02.11.2023 is applicable in the present appeal. As such, this appeal and the connected application being GA/2/2026 are dismissed as the monetary effect in this matter is below Rs. 1 crore.

(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)

(SUDIP DEB, J.) sp/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead