Calcutta High Court
WPO/488/2026 of SMT. PUSHPALATA VIJAY SURYWANSHI Vs THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. on 12 October 2026
THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Smt. Pushpalata Vijay Surywanshi Versus The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: 12th October 2026 Appearance: Mr. Alak Kr. Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Supratick
OD-05
WPO/488/2026
THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
Smt. Pushpalata Vijay Surywanshi
Versus
The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
Date: 12th October 2026
Appearance:
Mr. Alak Kr. Ghosh, Advocate
Mr. Supratick Shyamal, Advocate
Ms. Manisha Nath, Advocate
Mrs. Sonali Sengupta, Advocate
Ms. Paromita Barik, Advocate
for the petitioners
Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee, Advocate
Mr. Kausik Dey, Advocate
for the KMC
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon the municipal authorities to rectify the records by deleting the words “B” and “H” from the premises no.B/167A/H/11, B. B. Ganguly Street and restoring the premises no.167A/11, B. B. Ganguly Street, Kolkata – 700012 in the records of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and upon such rectification to issue fresh copy of the Assessment Roll Book.
3. Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate appears on behalf of the municipality.
2
4. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and noting that a representation is pending before the municipal authorities since 15th September 2026, I am of the view that the municipal authorities should dispose of the petitioner’s representations as aforesaid upon giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from date.
5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.
(RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.)
R. Bose