Calcutta High Court

PLA/301/2023 of IN THE GOODS OF SANJAY SURYA PRAKASH MEHTA ALSO KNOWN AS SANJAY PRAKASH MEHTA (DEC.) Vs NA on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary & Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PLA/301/2023 IN THE GOODS OF : SANJAY SURYA PRAKASH MEHTA ALSO KNOWN AS SANJAY PRAKASH MEHTA (DEC.) BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE Date : 6th October, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Rishabh

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

OD-15 ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary & Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE

PLA/301/2023

IN THE GOODS OF: SANJAY SURYA PRAKASH MEHTA ALSO KNOWN AS SANJAY PRAKASH MEHTA (DEC.)

BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE Date : 6th October, 2026.

Appearance: Mr. Rishabh Karnani, Adv. Mr. Joydeep Guha, Adv. …for the executors

The Court: Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. Mr. Karnani, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that all the legal heirs, by filing affidavits, have given their no objection to the grant of probate. He further submits that the affidavits of the attesting witnesses have also been filed. In view thereof, he submits that probate be granted in respect of the Will. This application has been presented for grant of probate in respect of the last Will and Testament dated 3rd January, 2021. In the application, it has been specifically mentioned that the writing is the last Will and Testament of the testator. The time of death has been mentioned, and it has also been stated that, at the time of death, the testator had a permanent place of abode within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. The affidavits filed by the attesting witnesses specifically aver that the testator had seen the witnesses sign the Will, and similarly, the witnesses had also seen the

2 testator put his signature on the Will. Thereafter, the petitioner complied with the formalities as mentioned in Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The petitioner has proved that the Will was duly executed and attested. Therefore, there cannot be any impediment to the grant of probate. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Let probate be granted upon payment of ad valorem Court fees, if not already paid. PLA/301/2023 is thus disposed of.

(PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE, J.)

sp3

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead