Calcutta High Court
CS-COM/154/2025 of LUX INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs MAYER AND CIE. GMBH AND CO. KG AND ANR on 29 September 2026
High Court at Calcutta Commercial Division Original Side IA NO. GA-COM/3/2026 In CS-COM/154/2025 LUX INDUSTRIES LIMITED Vs MAYER AND CIE. GMBH AND CO. KG AND ANR BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY Date : September 29, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Suryaneel Das, Adv. Mr. Debayan Sen, Adv. Ms.
OCD-4
In The High Court at Calcutta
Commercial Division
Original Side
IA NO. GA-COM/3/2026
In CS-COM/154/2025
LUX INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Vs
MAYER AND CIE. GMBH AND CO. KG AND ANR
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY
Date : September 29, 2026.
Appearance:
Mr. Suryaneel Das, Adv.
Mr. Debayan Sen, Adv.
Ms. Mahima Cholera, Adv.
Mr. Niket Ojha, Adv.
Mr. Sashwat Nayak, Adv.
…for the plaintiff
Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mitra, Adv.
Mr. Arindam Mandal, Adv.
Mr. Rishabh Dutta, Adv.
…for the defendant no. 1
Ms. Sweta Mukherjee, Adv.
Ms. Sarmishtha Dutta, Adv.
…for the respondent/ HDFC Bank
The Court: Mr. Suryaneel Das, learned advocate appears for the plaintiff.
Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mitra, learned advocate appears for the defendant no.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Ms. Sweta Mukherjee, learned advocate appears for the defendant no. 2/ HDFC Bank. Plaintiff being the buyer of the goods supplied by the defendant no. 1, has received the goods. In turn, the defendant no. 1 has also been paid off the price of the goods. The defendant no. 1 has to pay a sum of procedural fees and charges to the office of the Registrar, Original Side, which the defendant no. 1 undertakes to pay within a week.
2
IA NO. GA-COM/3/2026 In CS-COM/154/2025 A.R.,J Mr. Rabindra Kumar Mitra, learned advocate appearing for the defendant no. 1 submits that, due to variation in the foreign exchange price, the defendant no. 1 has received the price of the goods little lesser than what was the agreed price initially. In view of the above, nothing further survives in this suit as the parties have also submitted the same. Defendant no. 2 shall close the letter of credit forthwith. In view of the above, by the consent of the parties, the instant suit CS- COM/154/2025 along with the connected application IA No. GA-C0M/3/2026 stand disposed of.
(ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.)
Arsad