Calcutta High Court

APDT/6/2025 of ANIL RAJKUMAR MUKERJI AND ORS Vs RT REV PARITOSH CANNING AND ORS on 15 September 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE APDT/6/2025 WITH CS/111/2019 ANIL RAJKUMAR MUKERJI AND ORS. VS RT REV PARITOSH CANNING AND ORS. WITH APDT/7/2025 ASSOCIATION OF LA MARTINIERE ALUMNI VS RT. REV. PARITOSH CANNING AND ORS. BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE

OD-1 & 2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

ORIGINAL SIDE

APDT/6/2025

WITH

CS/111/2019

ANIL RAJKUMAR MUKERJI AND ORS.

VS

RT REV PARITOSH CANNING AND ORS.

WITH

APDT/7/2025

ASSOCIATION OF LA MARTINIERE ALUMNI

VS

RT. REV. PARITOSH CANNING AND ORS.

BEFORE:

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA

And

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE ANUJ SINGH

Date: 21st September, 2026.

Appearance:

Mr. Aishwarya Kumar Awasthi, Adv.(VC)

...For plaintiffs (in item 1&2)

Mr. Shounak Mukhopadhya Adv.

Mr. Tridibesh Dasgupta, Adv.

...For defendant no.2

Mr. Deep Basak, Adv.

…For defendant no.6

Mr. Ramendu Agarwal, Adv.

…For Petitioner (in item 2)

Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Adv.

Mr. B. P. Tiwari, Adv. (VC)

...For Defendant Nos.1&7

Page 1 of 2

1. The Court : These matters have been listed today under the heading “To Be Mentioned” for incorporating certain corrections in the Order dated 15th September, 2026.

2. In the 6th line of paragraph 5 on page 3 of the Order, the date “11th June, 1800” stands corrected to read as “11th January, 1800”.

3. Likewise, in the first line of paragraph 7 on page 3 of the Order, the date “11th June, 1800” stands corrected to read as “11th January, 1800”.

4. In the 3rd line of paragraph 8 on page 4 of the Order, the date “June 22, 1944” stands corrected to read as “June 6, 1944”.

5. In the second last line of paragraph 12 on page 5 of the Order, the number “APOT/305/1996” stands corrected to read as “APOT/385/1996”.

6. In the fourth line and in the second last line of paragraph 15 on page 6 of the Order, the expression “G.A.8 of 2025” stands corrected to read as “G.A.8 of 2023”.

7. In the fourth line of paragraph 24 on page 9 of the Order, the expression “application for addition of parties” stands corrected to read as “application for interim orders”.

8. In the second line of paragraph 25 on page 9 of the Order, the expression “GA/8/2025” stands corrected to read as “GA/8/2023”.

9. Let such corrections be incorporated in the Order dated 15th September, 2025.

10. Rest of the order shall remain unaltered.

(RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, J.)

(ANUJ SINGH, J.)

SN/nm.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead