Calcutta High Court
CUSTA/76/2025 of COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PORT KOLKATA Vs M/S GUPTA POWER INFRASTRUCTURE LTD AND ANR. on 10 September 2026
4 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION [CUSTOMS] ORIGINAL SIDE CUSTA/76/2025 IA NO: GA/1/2025 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PORT KOLKATA VS M/S GUPTA POWER INFRASTRUCTURE LTD AND ANR. BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SUDIP DEB
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
OD – 4 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION [CUSTOMS] ORIGINAL SIDE
CUSTA/76/2025 IA NO: GA/1/2025 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PORT KOLKATA VS M/S GUPTA POWER INFRASTRUCTURE LTD AND ANR.
BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SUDIP DEB Date: 10th September, 2026 Appearance: Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kaustav Kanti Maity, Adv. Mr. Anindya Kanan, Adv. Mr. Dhirodatto Chaudhuri, Adv. …for appellant.
Mr. Tejas Singh, Adv. …for respondent.
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for either of the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the monetary effect in this case is around Rs.68,89,957/- which is below the limit as prescribed in the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction under F. No.390/Misc./30/2023-JC dated 02.11.2023 but the case falls within the exceptional category under para 2 as per Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction dated 02.11.2023. We have perused the application. We do not find any reason to entertain this appeal where the appellant has not clearly suggested which exceptional clause as read in para 2 as per Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction dated 02.11.2023 is applicable in the present appeal. As such, this appeal and the connected application
being IA No.GA/1/2025 are dismissed as the monetary effect in this matter is below Rs. 1 crore.
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
(SUDIP DEB, J.) sd/