Calcutta High Court

AP-COM/731/2026 of NISHA SKYSCRAPER PRIVATE LIMITED Vs SHELTER PROJECTS LIMITED on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA COMMERCIAL DIVISION ORIGINAL SIDE AP-COM/731/2026 NISHA SKYSCRAPER PRIVATE LIMITED VS SHELTER PROJECTS LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH Date : 9th September, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Sankarsan Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kanodia, Adv. Mr. Sarbajit

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

OCD-6 ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA COMMERCIAL DIVISION ORIGINAL SIDE

AP-COM/731/2026

NISHA SKYSCRAPER PRIVATE LIMITED VS SHELTER PROJECTS LIMITED

BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH Date : 9th September, 2026.

Appearance: Mr. Sankarsan Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kanodia, Adv. Mr. Sarbajit Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Shreya Trivedi, Adv. ..for the petitioner

The Court: Affidavit of service is taken on record. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the respondent. Notice of Motion is also taken on record. The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for completion of the arbitral proceedings and publication of the arbitral award. This Court vide order dated 18th December, 2023 appointed the learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The pleadings were completed on 12th July, 2024. With the mutual consent of

2 the parties the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal was further extended for a period of six months. Thereafter, this Court vide order dated 6th January, 2026 had extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of eight months till 6th September, 2026. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is presently at the stage of final arguments. Upon consideration of the submissions of learned Counsel for the petitioner and the materials placed on record, this Court is satisfied that there has been no undue or unwarranted delay on the part of the learned sole Arbitrator in conducting the proceedings. Keeping in mind the advanced stage of the arbitral proceedings and in the interest of justice, the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal is extended for a further period of six months from today. The learned sole Arbitrator is requested to make all reasonable endeavours to conclude the proceedings and publish the arbitral award within the extended time period. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands disposed of.

(GAURANG KANTH, J.)

bp.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead