Calcutta High Court

CS-COM/21/2026 of BOWREAH JUTE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs RISHAB SUMER MEHTA on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

High Court at Calcutta Commercial Division Original Side IA NO. GA-COM/2/2026 In CS-COM/21/2026 BOWREAH JUTE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs RISHAB SUMER MEHTA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY Date : September 1, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Tridib Bose, Adv.(vc) Mr. Rahul Poddar, Adv. … for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

OCD-15 In The High Court at Calcutta Commercial Division Original Side

IA NO. GA-COM/2/2026 In CS-COM/21/2026

BOWREAH JUTE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs RISHAB SUMER MEHTA

BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY Date : September 1, 2026.

Appearance: Mr. Tridib Bose, Adv.(vc) Mr. Rahul Poddar, Adv. … for the plaintiff

The Court: Mr. Tridib Bose, learned advocate (v/c) appears for the plaintiff/ applicant herein. None appears for the defendant. Prayers from the master summons are quoted below:- a) An order be passed that the suit being C.S. (COM) 21 of 2026 together with application filed under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 be permitted to be withdrawn as the disputes between the parties have been settled; b) Ad-interim orders in terms of prayer above; c) Such further and/or other order or orders be passed and/or direction or directions be given as Your Lordship may deem fit and proper.

IA NO. GA-COM/2/2026 In CS-COM/21/2026 A.R.,J The relevant averments from the supporting affidavit in support of the prayers are quoted below: “9) In view whereof, the obligation of the guarantor under the settlement agreement dated 7 August 2024 stands discharged. Therefore, no sum is due and payable by the respondent to the petitioner herein.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the plaintiff/ petitioner humbly states and submits that the suit being CS (COM) No. 21 of 2026, together with the application filed under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 being IA G.A. (COM) NO. 1 of 2026, be permitted to be withdrawn as the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent have been settled.” In view of the above, the instant civil suit CS-COM/21/2026 stands dismissed, as withdrawn since the disputes between the parties have been settled. Consequently, the connected application IA GA-COM/1/2026, after being treated as on day’s list, also stands dismissed. Accordingly, IA GA-COM/2/2026 stands allowed, without any order as to costs.

(ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.)

Arsad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead