Calcutta High Court
CS-COM/89/2026 of INTECH SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED Vs EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED AND ANOTHER on 3 August 2026
tthhee HHiigghh CCoouurrtt aatt CCaallccuuttttaa Commercial Division Original Side CS-COM/89/2026 INTECH SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED VS EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED AND ANOTHER BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY Date : August 3, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Rupak Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Varun Kothari, Adv.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
OC-2
In the High Court at Calcutta Commercial Division Original Side
CS-COM/89/2026
INTECH SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED VS EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED AND ANOTHER
BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY Date : August 3, 2026.
Appearance: Mr. Rupak Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Varun Kothari, Adv. Mr. Noorul Islam, Adv. Ms. Ritika Pipalwa, Adv. … for the plaintiff
The Court: Considering the fact that both the defendants, as described in the cause title, carry on their respective businesses within the territorial limit of this Court, there is no scope for praying for any leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent. Accordingly, the prayer made in the plaint insofar as leave under Clause 12 is concerned, the same shall be read to be as deleted from the plaint. On reading of the averments made in paragraphs 53 and 54 specifically in the plaint read with other paragraphs, it appears to this Court that the subject Bank Guarantee has already been invoked. Once the Bank Guarantee has already been invoked, this Court finds in the facts of this case that there cannot be any contemplation for urgent interim relief and hence, the parties should travel through the procedure
2
CS-COM/89/2026 A.R., J. of pre-institution mediation, as provided under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Accordingly, the plaint stands rejected only on this ground that the parties are referred for pre-institution mediation. The matter stands referred to the Member Secretary, Mediation and Conciliation Committee, High Court at Calcutta to hold and conclude the mediation, in accordance with law, within four weeks from the date of communication of this order. Court fees paid shall be returned to the plaintiff with a leave to utilize the same if a further suit is filed after the mediation on the self- same cause of action and between the self-same parties.
(ANIRUDDHA ROY, J.)
RS