Calcutta High Court
WPO/907/2016 of TRIWAVE INFRACON PVT LTD & ANR Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS on 31 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE WPO/907/2016 TRIWAVE INFRACON PVT LTD & ANR VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA Date: 31stJuly, 2026. Appearance: Mr. AbhrotoshMajumdar, Sr.Adv. Mr.
OD-1
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
WPO/907/2016
TRIWAVE INFRACON PVT LTD & ANR
VS
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Date: 31stJuly, 2026.
Appearance:
Mr. AbhrotoshMajumdar, Sr.Adv.
Mr. Siddhartha Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Meghnad Dutta, Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Upadhyay, Adv.
…for the petitioners
Mr. Nand Gopal Khaitan, Ld.AOR.
Mr. PiushChaturvedi, , Adv.
Mr. Anujit Mukherjee, Adv.
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners, on instruction, submits that the petitioners seek to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to approach the appropriate statutory authority for the self-same reliefs on similar grounds.
2. In such view of the matter, WPO 907 of 2016 is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the writ petitioners to move the appropriate statutory
2
forum with a challenge against the self-same order as well as subsequent connected orders, if any, on the self-same grounds as taken in the present writ petition as well as further grounds, if the writ petitioners so deem fit and proper.
3. It is made clear that all questions raised in the present writ petition by both sides are kept open for being decided before the said forum, if such challenge is filed.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. No order as to costs.
6. Urgent certified copies of this order be made available to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
TR/