Calcutta High Court

ITAT/176/2026 of PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA Vs M/S BOSCON LEATHER PRODUCTS PVT LTD on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

11 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax] ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/176/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA VS M/S BOSCON LEATHER PRODUCTS PVT LTD BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE UDAY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

OD – 11 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax] ORIGINAL SIDE

ITAT/176/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA VS M/S BOSCON LEATHER PRODUCTS PVT LTD

BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR Date : 28th July, 2026 Appearance : Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. …for appellant.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Patodia, Adv. Ms. Megha Agarwal, Adv. …for respondent.

The Court : Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant. There is a delay of 748 days in filing the appeal. We are satisfied with the explanation offered for not preferring the appeal within time. Therefore, the delay is condoned. The application being GA/1/2026 is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the tax effect in this case is Rs.4,82,370/- which is below the tax limit as prescribed in the CBDT Circular No.9/2024 dated 17th September, 2024 and Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15th March, 2024 but the case falls within the exceptional category under para 3.1(h) as per CBDT Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15th March, 2024. We have perused the application, the assessment order, appellate order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax and the order of the learned Tribunal dated

07.11.2023 for the Assessment Year 2014-2015. We do not find any reason to entertain this appeal where the appellant has not clearly suggested which exceptional clause as read in para 3.1(h) as per CBDT Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15th March, 2024 is applicable in the present appeal. As such, this appeal and the connected application being GA/2/2026 are dismissed as the tax effect in this matter is below Rs. 2 crores.

(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)

(UDAY KUMAR, J.) sd/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead