Calcutta High Court
CUSTA/70/2026 of COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE KOLKATA Vs M/S PALAATAKAA TRADING COMPANY on 23 July 2026
SHEET CUSTA/70/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE KOLKATA VS M/S PALAATAKAA TRADING COMPANY BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR Date:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
OD 24 ORDER SHEET CUSTA/70/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE KOLKATA VS M/S PALAATAKAA TRADING COMPANY
BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR Date: 23rd July, 2026.
Appearance: Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Abhradip Maity, Adv. …for the appellant
Mr. N.K. Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Nilotpal Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Prabir Bera, Adv. …for the respondent
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for either of the parties. There is a delay of 195 days in filing the appeal. We are satisfied with the explanation offered for not preferring the appeal within time. Therefore, the delay is condoned. The application being GA 1 of 2026 is allowed. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the monetary effect in this case is around Rs.50 lakhs which is below the limit as prescribed in the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction under F. No.390/Misc./30/2023- JC dated 02.11.2023 but the case falls within the exceptional category under
2 para 2 and para 3 as per Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction dated 02.11.2023. We have perused the application. We do not find any reason to entertain this appeal where the appellant has not clearly suggested which exceptional clause as read in para 2 and para 3 as per Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs’ instruction dated 02.11.2023 is applicable in the present appeal. As such, this appeal and the connected application being GA/2/2026 are dismissed as the monetary effect in this matter is below Rs. 1 crore.
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
(UDAY KUMAR, J.)
B.Pal