Calcutta High Court

APO/346/2015 of M/S. BALMER LAWRIE & CO. LTD. Vs THE, CHAIRMAN, HERITAGE COMMITTEE, K.M.C. & ORS. on 12 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SHEET APO/346/2015 WITH WPO/698/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S. BALMER LAWRIE & CO. LTD. VS THE CHAIRMAN, HERITAGE COMMITTEE, K.M.C. & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE APURBA SINHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

OD 14

ORDER SHEET APO/346/2015 WITH WPO/698/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE

M/S. BALMER LAWRIE & CO. LTD. VS THE CHAIRMAN, HERITAGE COMMITTEE, K.M.C. & ORS.

BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE AND The Hon’ble JUSTICE APURBA SINHA RAY Date: 12th June, 2026.

Appearance: Ms. Sonal Shah, Adv. Mr. Kushagra Shah, Adv. …for the appellant

Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Gopal Chandra Das, Adv. Ms. Tanusree Dasgupta, Adv. …for the K.M. C.

Dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J.

The Court: Read orders dated May 8, 2026 and May 15, 2026. It would appear from the said orders that various disputes of factual nature are involved in this case. Such disputes cannot be conveniently adjudicated before the Writ Court. Learned advocate for the appellant today tells us that she has obtained instruction from her client. The appellant will approach the appropriate civil forum with its grievance. However, the time period spent in pursuing the remedy

2 before this Court i.e. learned Single Judge and the Division Bench, should be excluded for computing the period of limitation in case a suit is instituted. We dispose of this appeal by granting liberty to the appellant to approach the appropriate civil forum. If any proceeding is instituted before the civil forum, that forum will consider granting benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act to the plaintiff as regards the issue of limitation, in accordance with law. Copies of the written instruction obtained by the learned advocate for the appellant be retained with the records. APO/346/2015 is, accordingly, disposed of.

(ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.)

(APURBA SINHA RAY, J.)

B.Pal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead