Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK vs MEGHA PLOYMER ORS on 29 April 2025
/'\
Before SUSHIL KUMAR RASTOGI, presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi TA No.264 OF 2OZg INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK VS M/S MEGHA POTYMER &
Indian Overseas Bank
Vs.
1. M/s Megha polymer
2. Mr. Mahender Singh
3. Smt. Ruchisingh
oRs
Reserved on
: 06.02.2025
Pronounced on : 29.04.2025
- Applicant bank
- Defendants
Present: Ms. Sweety Sood
applicant bank.
Counsel appears for
Defendants are expafte since 24.t2.2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
FINAL ORDER
This original application has been filed by the applicant ban( on 13.03.2015 through Shri. M. Muthuvel Chidambaram, Assistant General Manager and Principal Offlcer of the applicant bank, under Section 19 ofthe RDB Act, 1993 against the defendants for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,05,54,ggg/_ together with cost, charges and pendentellite and future interest @76.250/o from date of filing of this O.A. tiil the realization in full.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the request of defendants, the applicant bank sanctioned an Open Cash Credit (OCC) Facitity of Rs.81,00,000/_ against the security of their assets to meet the fund requirement to purchase raw material etc., vide sanction letter dated 27.08.2010. To secure the aforesaid loan facility, the defendant no.2 offered his prope(v for eguitable s\
TA NO. 264t2023
mortgage with the bank vide property No. 120, C_2, 25.90 &. Mtrs. Sector-16, Rohini. Smt. Mamta Bhardwaj also offered her property no.l2t, C-2,2590 Sq. Mtrs. Sector-16, Rohini for mortgage as a Guarantor. The defendant no.3 gave her personal guarantee and signed the guarantee deed. The defendants executed all necessary loaning documents dated 01.09.2010 and LL.OZ.ZOLZ-.
3. It is further submitted that the defendants enjoyed and utilized the Loan facility, but failed to maintain the financial discipline and failed to repay the due amounts. The applicant bank requested the defendants to regularize the loan account by visits and letters, but there was no response from the defendants, hence the account was classified as NpA on 31.0g.2012. Therefore, the applicant bank served a legal notice dated 10.09.2012 and demand notice dated 23.LO.ZOLI to the defendants but failed to recover the same Thus, the present O.AffA is preferred by the applicant bank to recover its dues.
4. On notice by this Tribunal, the defendants failed to put appearance at all, despite publication. Accordingly, all the defendants were proceeded against expafte on 24.L2.2024.
5. The applicant bank has filed evidence by way of affidavit of Sh. P.C Satapathy, Chief Manager of the applicant bank as Annexure-A to Annexure A-I along with the OA which have gone unchallenged and un_ rebutted. Hence, the case of the applicant bank stands fully established against the defendants with respect to non-payment of EMI/ outstandinq amount. s\
TA NO. 264/2023
6. After perusing the records, this Tribunal is of the view that the applicant bank has proved its case beyond reasonable doubts. The evidence and documents lead by the applicant bank not rebutted by the defendants by not placing any evidence and there is no question of disbelieving the evidence lead by the applicant bank documents. based upon the written/printed In the light of the above discussiong the present TA deserves to be allowed.
ORDER
1) I hereby allow this T.A. of the Applicant Bank and direct the defendant nos. 1 to 3 to pay joinUy and severally to the applicant bank within 30 days from today, a sum of Rs.1,05,54,g8g/_ along with cost, expenses and interest @ l2o/o from the date of filing of this O.A which has become TA till the date of realization. In case of failure to deposit the above amount within the stipulated period, the same shall be recovered from the sale of hypothecated assets and the sale of the mortgaged property bearing No. 120, C-2, 25.90 Sq. Mtrs. Sector-16, Rohini and property bearing no.727, C-2,25.90 Sq. Mtrs. Sector-16, Rohini. In case of short fall, the same shall be recovered from the sale of the personal movable and immovable assets of the defendant nos. 1to 3.
3) Recovery Certificate be issued forthwith and be sent to Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Delhi. EA-".'-
TA NO. 264/2023
4) The registry of this Tribunar is hereby directed to issue free copy of the order and send the same to both the parties.
5) Parties are direct to appear before the Ld. Recovery Officer, DRT-II, Delhi on 30.06.2025. pending IAs, if any, stand disposed of. File be consigned to records. --s-\- Date: 29.04.2025 (su_sHI_L KUMAR d\Srocr) PRESIDING OFEICER DRT-II, Delhi This judgement has been pronounced in open court. signed, dated and Date:29.04.2025 s.J (susHrl KUM-AR RASTOGT) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT.II, De|hi T