Calcutta High Court
TEMPAPO-IPD/2/2026 of GODREJ CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED Vs RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED on 27 February 2026
THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE TEMPAPO-IPD/2/2026 WITH IP.COM/3/2026 IA NO:GA-COM/1/2026 GODREJ CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED -VS- RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE RAJASEKHARMANTHA And TheHon’ble JUSTICEMD.
OD-1
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
TEMPAPO-IPD/2/2026
WITH IP.COM/3/2026
IA NO:GA-COM/1/2026
GODREJ CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
-VS-
RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA
And
The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Date: 02.03.2026.
ADVOCATES FOR APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
Mr. M. Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.
Mr. R. Bachawat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. R. Bhattacharya, Sr. Adv.
Mr. S. Roychowdhury, Adv.
Mr. S. Mitra, Adv.
Mr. A. Chaturvedi, Adv.
Mr. N. Nadkarni, Adv.
Ms. D. Singh, Adv.
Ms. V. Pandey, Adv.
Mr. S. Mukherjee, Adv.
Ms. A. Bohra, Adv.
Ms. S. Khannum, Adv.
ADVOCATES FOR RESPONDENT:
Mr. S. Sarkar, Sr. Adv.
Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, Sr. Adv.
Mr. R. Banerji, Sr. Adv.
Mr. S. Ginodia, Adv.
Mr. J. Lal, Adv.
Ms. N. Roy, Adv.
Mr. Shwetank Ginodia, Adv.
Ms. M. Agarwal, Adv.
Mr. N. Choudhury, Adv.
Ms. S. Firdous, Adv.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Court: The order dated February 27, 2026 is mentioned for correction.
2. In the fourth line of paragraph 9 at third page of the order, after the expression “published since”, the expression “February 16, 2026 though the appellant’s products were sold in the market since” shall be added.
3. In the second line of paragraph 12 at third page of the order, after the expression “that the alleged”, the expression “products shown in” shall be added.
4. In the third line of paragraph 12 at page 3 of the order, the expression “published” shall stand deleted and be replaced with the expression “sold”.
5. In the third line of paragraph at page of the order, the expression “plaintiff/respondent mislead” shall stand corrected and be read as “plaintiff/respondent misled”.
6. In the first line of continuing paragraph 12 at page 4 of the order, after the expression “indicate that the”, the expression “bottle in the” shall be added.
7. In the second line of the continuing paragraph 12 at page 4 of the order, the expression “published” shall stand deleted and be replaced with the expression “used”.
8. In the second line of paragraph 27 at page 7 of the order, the expression “concerned” shall stand deleted and be replaced with the expression “considered”.
9. Save as aforesaid, the order dated 27.02.2026 shall remain.
10. Let this order be incorporated in the order dated 27.02.2026. (RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, J.) (MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI, J.) tk