Calcutta High Court
WPA/30044/2025 of PRITI MONDAL AND ORS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 31 December 2025
WPA/30044/2025 PRITI MONDAL AND ORS VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Anjan Bhattacharya, Ms. Anita Shaw, Ms. Seema Thakur, Advocates … … For the Petitioners Mr. Swapan Kr. Dutta, ld. GP Mr. Biplab Guha, Ms. Paramita Pal, Advocates … … For the State 1.
Dd 4 31.12.2025
WPA/30044/2025
PRITI MONDAL AND ORS
VS
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Mr. Anjan Bhattacharya,
Ms. Anita Shaw,
Ms. Seema Thakur, Advocates
… … For the Petitioners
Mr. Swapan Kr. Dutta, ld. GP
Mr. Biplab Guha,
Ms. Paramita Pal, Advocates
… … For the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocates for the parties are present.
2. Heard the learned advocates.
3. The grievance of the writ petitioners is that the representation made by the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 on 29. 01.2024 is pending consideration.
4. Thus, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representation made by the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order and by passing a reasoned order.
5. However, as the copy of the representation of the petitioner No. 1 is not annexed to the writ petition, the said writ petitioner is granted opportunity to file a fresh representation for consideration by the said authorities. (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)