Calcutta High Court
WPA/30005/2025 of NAHID JAMIL Vs KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. on 31 December 2025
Item no.D/L 23 Court No. 07 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) Surojit, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 30005 of 2025 In the matter of : Nahid Jamil …. Petitioner VS. Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors. ….Respondents For the
31st Dec.,2025
Item no.D/L 23
Court No. 07
Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)
Surojit, A.R.(Ct.)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Case No.
WPA 30005 of 2025
In the matter of :
Nahid Jamil
…. Petitioner
VS.
Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
….Respondents
For the Petitioners:
Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee
Mr. Sumitava Chakraborty
Mr. Shantanu Chakraborty
….Advocates
For the KMC:
Mr. Barin Banerjee
Ms. Ina Bhattacharyya
….Advocates
For the Respondent no. 5:
Mr. Avirup Chatterjee
Mr. Rishov Das
….Advocates
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by issuance of notice under Section by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation to stop the work.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the representation for regularization in respect of T-14D/1, Linton Street, Police Station-Beniapukur, Kolkata-700014 is not considered by the Special Officer Building, Kolkata Municipal Corporation.
4. Learned advocate for the KMC submits that the Special Officer may consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Special Officer Building being the respondent no. 3 herein to consider and dispose of the representation made by the petitioner in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the necessary parties.
6. Steps shall be taken in the matter at the earliest but positively within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.
7. A reasoned order shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner immediately thereafter.
8. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the representation along with all supporting documents at the time of communicating the order of this Court.
9. Petitioner will be at liberty to place all relevant provisions of law before the authority at the time of hearing.
10. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken by the authority.
11. The writ petition stands disposed of.
12. All parties are to act on the basis of the server copy of this order, duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
13. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Biswaroop Chowdhury J.)