Calcutta High Court
WPA/30006/2025 of MAHINDRA LOGISTICS LIMITED Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 31 December 2025
Bench 31.12.2025 Court No.07 S.M/B.K.N IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION WPA 30006 of 2025 Mahindra Logistics Limited Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Amit Kumar Nag, Ms. Ranjaboti Roy, Ms. Rishita Sarkar … for the Petitioner. Mr. Vimal Kr. Shali,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
S/L 24 Vacation Bench 31.12.2025 Court No.07 S.M/B.K.N
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
WPA 30006 of 2025
Mahindra Logistics Limited Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Amit Kumar Nag, Ms. Ranjaboti Roy, Ms. Rishita Sarkar … for the Petitioner. Mr. Vimal Kr. Shali, Ld. AGP, Mr. Anubrat Santra … for the State.
Mr. Swapan Kr. Pal … for the Respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4.
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is kept with the record. Learned advocates for the parties are present. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned advocate for respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4. It is the grievance of the writ petitioner that the petitioner is charged by the respondent no. 3 of committing the offences under Rule 6 of Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 which is not maintainable against the petitioner. Learned advocate for the petitioner further draws attention to the representation made by the petitioner being marked Annexure P-5. Upon hearing the learned advocates this Court is of the view that this writ petition should be disposed by directing the Assistant Controller of Legal Metrology, Hooghly Division, Department of Legal Metrology to consider the representation in accordance with law. Thus this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent no. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner being Annexure P-5 to the writ petition in accordance with law
2 within a period of five weeks from the date of communication of this order after giving the writ petitioner an opportunity of being heard. During consideration of the representation no coercive steps should be taken against the petitioner. Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all necessary formalities.
(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)