Armed Forces Tribunal
Daily order 24.03.2017 in MAs-3, 4 -2017 on 24 March 2017
IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL
REGIONAL BENCH, GUWAHATI.
M.A. 03 of 2017 &
M.A. 04 of 2017
(In O.A-0215)
No. 436985M
Ex-Sep Kaimuanlal,
S/o Shri Soivom Vaiphei
Resident of Demthring, Madanrting,
Block-II, Shillong, East Khasi Hills Dist.
Meghalaya.
…..Applicant.
By legal practitioners
for Applicant.
Mr. Rocky Sharon
Mr S Worthing.
-Versus-
1.Union of India
Through Secretary,
Ministry of Defence,
DHQ PO New Delhi-110011.
2. The Commanding Officer,
3rd Bn the Assam Regiment,
C/o 99 APO.
3. The Commandant,
Assam Regiment Centre,
Happy Valle, Shillong, Meghalaya.
4. The Senior Record Officer,
Assam Regiment Centre,
Happy Valley, Shillong, Meghalaya.
…….Respondents
By legal practitioners
for Respondents.
Mr. Chandra Barua, CGSC.
PRESENT
HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY, MEMBER (J)
HON`BLE VICE ADMIRAL MP MURALIDHARAN, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24 Mar. 2017
(By B.P.Katakey,J.) The applicants, who filed O.A.-02/2015 before this Tribunal which was dismissed vide order dated 18.4.2016, has filed these applications, one for seeking leave to appeal before the Hon`ble Suprme Court and the other for condonation of delay in filing such application seeking leave.
-2-
2. We have heard Mr. Rocky Sharon, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. C.Baruah, learned Central Govt. Standing Counsel assisted by Col Anand, OIC, Legal Cell, Guwahati appearing for the respondents.
3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the order dated 18.4.2016 passed in O.A. 02//2015, we are of the considered opinion that it is not a fit case to grant leave to appeal before the Hon`ble Supreme Court under Section 31 of the AFT Act, since the said order does not involve any question of law having general public importance.
4. M.As accordingly stand dismissed.
MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J)
Nath.