Armed Forces Tribunal
CA 07/2016 dated 23-05-2017 on 23 May 2017
IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL
REGIONAL BENCH, GUWAHATI.
CA- 07/2016
(In OA-05/2014)
Ex. 257337 AC Balwant Rai
Son of Late Lt Col Raj Kishore Rai,
Resident of House No. 28,
Near BSNL Tele Exchange,
Christian Basi, Dispur,
Guwahati-781005.
…..Applicant.
By legal practitioners
for Applicant.
Mr. Akhilesh Lal.
-Versus-
1. The Defence Secretary,
Ministry of Defence,
DHQ Post, South Block,
New Delhi- 110001.
2. The Air Chief Marshal,
The Chief of Air Staff,
Air Force Headquarters,
Vayu Bhawan, New Delhi-110011.
3. The Officer in Charge,
Air Force Pension & Welfare (SP),
Air Force Records Officer,
Subroto Park, New Delhi-110010.
4. The Senior Accounts Officer (Pension), O/o the Principal Contyroller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Draupadighat, Allahabad-211014.
5. The Direcotor III of the Officer of the Directorate of Air Veterans, Subroto Park, New Delhi- 110010.
…….Respondents
By legal practitioners
for Respondents.
Mr. C.Barua,CGSC.
-2-
PRESENT
HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.KATAKEY, MEMBER (J)
HON`BLE VICE ADMIRAL MP MURALIDHARAN, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
23.5.2017
Heard Mr. Akhilesh Lal, learned Counsel for the applicant.
2. The applicant in O.A. 05/2014 has filed this C.A.-07/2016 alleging non- compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 10.02.2016 passed in O.A. 05/2014.
3. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents producing a copy of the PPO No. S/0032/2017 dated 20th April, 2017 has submitted that the directions contained in the order has been complied with.
4. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant in the C.A. submitted that as per his instruction the monetary benefit in terms of the PPO has not yet been credited in the applicant’s account. It has also been submitted that the costs awarded vide order dated 15.12.2016 has not been paid.
5. Having regard to the aforesaid PPO, copy of which is placed on record, we close and dispose of the C.A. giving liberty to the applicant to approach this Tribunal again by means of another M.A., if the benefit of the PPO is not received within a period of 2 (two) months from today.
6. The respondents shall also pay the costs awarded to the applicant vide order dated 15.12.2016 passed in the present C.A. within the aforesaid period of two months from today, failing which it is also open to the applicant to approach this Tribunal by means of another M.A.
7. C.A. accordingly stands closed and disposed of.
MEMBER (A)
MEMBER(J) nath