Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/50075/2017 of PRIYANKA DEVI AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 28 December 2017
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-50075 of 2017 Date of Decision: December 28, 2017 Priyanka Devi and another ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL *** Present: Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-50075 of 2017Date of Decision: December 28, 2017
Priyanka Devi and another
State of Haryana and others
Versus
Petitioners!
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JIUSTICEK SUDHIR MITT
ake
Present:Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate|for the petitioners Sudhir Mittal, J- (Oral)
The present petition has been filed seeking protection of life and libertyas the petitioners fear that respondents No. 4 to 7 (father, mother and brothers ofpetitioner No. 1) will cause them bodily harm as their marriage has been performedagainst their wishes.
Petitioners No. | and 2 are major and the same is proved by theirAadhar Cards (Annexures P-2 and P-3).
In view of above, | deem it appropriate to direct respondent No. 2 toensure that life and liberty of the petitioners be protected by providing themadequate protection. The representation (Annexure P-6) already made as well as thefacts mentioned in this petition shall be kept in mind by him.
The petition is accordingly disposed of. |
December 28, 2017reend
ISUDHIR MITTAL]JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No