Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/739/2026 of ANAND MATH MANDIR SAMITI KAUHI Vs DHALENDRA RAM GAJENDRA on 15 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44820
2026:CGHC:44820-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 739 of 2026 1 - Anand Math Mandir Samiti Kauhi Tehsil Patan , District Durg C.G. Through Its Vice President Koushal Tiwari, S/o Shri Purendra Nath Tiwari, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Kauhi, Tehsil Patan District
CGHC010294272026
2026:CGHC:44820-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 739 of 2026
1 - Anand Math Mandir Samiti Kauhi Tehsil Patan , District Durg C.G. Through Its Vice President Koushal Tiwari, S/o Shri Purendra Nath Tiwari, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Kauhi, Tehsil Patan District Durg C.G.
2 - Rajesh Alias Huleshwar Prasad Tiwari S/o Late Shri Ashok Tiwari Aged About 50 Years All R/o Village Kauhi, Tehsil Patan, District Durg C.G.
3 - Shiv Kumar Pandey S/o Late Shri Prahalad Pandey Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Kauhi, Tehsil Patan District Durg C.G.
4 – Mannulal Tikriya, Son of Late Shri Domar Singh Tikriha, aged about 52
years, R/o Village Kauhi, Tehsil Patan District Durg C.G.
... Petitioners
versus
1 - Dhalendra Ram Gajendra S/o Late Shri Bhuwan Lal Gajendra Aged About 50 Years R/o Quarter No. 13, Guru Kripa, Sadan, Pipe Factory Rood, New Shanti Nagar, Raipur Tehsil And District Raipur C.G.
2 - Ramesh Modi (Died) Dr, Lalit Makhija, President Of State Chhattisgrh, Vishwa, Hindu Parishad Office At Satya Narayan Bhawan, Kali Nagar Raipur Tehsil
And
District
Raipur
C.G.
3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, Durg District Durg
C.G.
4 - General Public
... Respondents
For Petitioners
:
Ms. Kokila Beriya, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B.P.
Sharma, Advocate
For State
:
Mr. Deepak Singh, P.L.
Page 1 of 2
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput, Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 16.10.2026
1. Heard on I.A. No.1/2026, an application for condonation of delay in filing the instant MCC.
2. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.
3. This MCC has been filed for restoration of F.A. No. 515/2019 which was dismissed on account of peremptory order passed by this Court on 26.08.2025.
4. The present MCC is not opposed by learned counsel for the Respondent.
5. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and F.A. No.515/2019 is directed to be restored to its original number.
6. Accordingly, the present MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge Prakash
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…