Chhattisgarh High Court
SA/451/2009 of RAM KISHORE AGRAWAL Vs (A) SMT RAJ KUMARI on 15 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44906
2026:CGHC:44906 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 451 of 2009 Ram Kishore Agrawal S/o Madho Prasad Agrawal, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Nirtu, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh................Plaintiff, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant Versus 1
CGHC010008782009
2026:CGHC:44906
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 451 of 2009
Ram Kishore Agrawal S/o Madho Prasad Agrawal, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Nirtu, Tahsil
And
District
Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh................Plaintiff, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
Versus
1 - (A) Smt Raj Kumari Wd/o Makhan Lal, Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Mahuda, Tahsil
And
District
Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh................Defendent, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 1.1 - (B) Ramesh Kumar, S/o Makhan Lal, Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Mahuda, Tahsil
And
District
Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh................Defendent, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 1.2 - (C) Krishna Kumar, S/o Makhan Lal, Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Mahuda, Tahsil
And
District
Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh................Defendent, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 1.3 - (D) Smt. Vimla Bai W/o Mahesh Chandra, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Jhalmala, Tahsil Bemetara, District Durg Chhattisgarh...............Defendent, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 1.4 - (E) Smt. Shashi Kiran, W/o Harish Chandra Sharma, Aged About 36 Years R/o Sarkanda, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh...............Defendent,
Page 1 of 6
1.5 - (F) Ku. Sharda, D/o Makhan Lal, Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Mahuda, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh
2 - Vyas Narayan (Died) Through Legal Heirs- 2.1 - (A) Arvind Kumar Shukla, S/o Late Vyas Narayan, Aged About 52
Years R/o Petrol Pump, Village Bachhoud, Tehsil Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2.2 - (B) Ramadhar Shukla (Died) Through Lrs. As Per Honble Court Order Dated 22-02-2021.
2.2.1 - (B)(1). Nishikant Shukla S/o Late Ramadhar Shukla Aged About 55 Years R/o Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.,
SAIFAN
KHAN
Digitally
signed by
SAIFAN
KHAN
Page 2 of 6
2.3 - (C) Shiv Kumar Shukla, S/o Late Vyas Narayan, Aged About 48
Years R/o Village Mahuda, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.,
District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3 - Deleted (A) Smt. Lagarhin Bai As Per Honble Court Order Dated 28-
10-2020
3.1 - (B) Damodar Prasad, S/o Gayaram Shukla, R/o Village Farhada, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh
3.2 - (C) Radheshyam, S/o Gayaram Shukla, R/o Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3.3 - Deleted (D) Smt. Ambika Bai As Per Honble Court Order Dated 28-
Page 3 of 6
3.4 - (E) Sharda, D/o Sushil Chand, Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Farhada, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District :
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3.5 - (F) Ku. Sapna, D/o Sushil Chand, Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Farhada, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District :
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3.6 - (G) Tarun, S/o Sushil Chand, Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Gatora, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3.7 - (H) Arun, S/o Sushil Chand, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Farhada, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District :
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3.8 - Deleted (I) Smt. Chandra Bhama Bai As Per Honble Court Order Dated 28-10-2020
3.9 - (J) Mahendra Kumar, S/o Daulat Ram, Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Mahuda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur,
Page 4 of 6
3.10 - (K) Umesh Kumar, S/o Daulat Ram, Aged About 44 Years R/o New Sarkanda, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3.11 - Deleted (L) Smt. Rahi Bai As Per Honble Court Order Dated 28-
10-2020
4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh,
District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :
None in two rounds.
For Respondents
:
Mr. BP Gupta, Advocate and
Ms. Shubha Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sushma Sawant
Page 5 of 6
Order of Board
16.10.2026
1. This second appeal has been preferred by the appellant/plaintiff- Ram Kishore Agrawal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short the “CPC”) feeling aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 07.07.2009, passed by the first appellate Court in CA No.10-A/2018 (Ram Kishore v. Smt. Raj Kumari and others), by which his first appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 24.12.2007, passed by the learned trial Court in CS No.34-A/2007 (Ram Kishore v. Smt. Raj Kumari and others), has been dismissed.
2. It transpires from the record of the case that on the last date of listing of this matter i.e. on 15.09.2026, fixed date SPC was issued to the appellant for making arrangement for his representation in the matter. However, as per office report dt. 13.10.2026, the said SPC issued on 17.09.2026 returned unserved with an endorsement that the house mentioned in the address of the appellant is vacated and he has moved somewhere else. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant even in the passover round.
3. Under such circumstances, the Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. It is ordered accordingly. sd/-
(Sushma Sawant) JUDGE S@if
Page 6 of 6
Loading citations and judicial treatment…