Chhattisgarh High Court
CRA/1911/2026 of BHOJRAM YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 15 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44781
2026:CGHC:44781 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 1911 of 2026 1 - Bhojram Yadav S/o Baharata Yadav . Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Bardula, Police Station Kosir, District- Sarangarh, Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - Jagdish Sahu S/o Bhagirathi Aged About 48 Years R/o Vijaypur,
CGHC010279802026
2026:CGHC:44781
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRA No. 1911 of 2026
1 - Bhojram Yadav S/o Baharata Yadav . Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Bardula, Police Station Kosir, District- Sarangarh, Bilaigarh (C.G.)
2 - Jagdish Sahu S/o Bhagirathi Aged About 48 Years R/o Vijaypur, Police Station Chakradhar Nagar, District- Raigarh (C.G.)
3 - Hari Krishna Sahu S/o Jagdish Sahu Aged About 23 Years R/o Vijaypur, Police Station Chakradhar Nagar, District- Raigarh (C.G.)
... Appellant(s)
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Appellants
: Mr. Prabhat K. Saxena, Advocate.
For Respondent/State
: Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey, Judge
Order on Board
16.10.2026
1. From perusal of the record, it transpires that appellant Nos. 2 and 3, namely, Jagdish Sahu and Hari Krishna Sahu, have already been granted bail by the learned trial Court vide order dated 25.05.2026. However, the present appeal has also been preferred on their KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN
Page 1 of 2
behalf, along with appellant No. 1, whose prayer for bail has not been considered by the learned trial Court.
2. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal, insofar as it relates to appellant Nos. 2 and 3, is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed to that extent.
3. However, appellant No. 1 shall be at liberty to pursue the prayer for bail in accordance with law by filing a fresh application, if so advised. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Kunal
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…