Chhattisgarh High Court
REVP/336/2026 of ANKIT SINGH (IN PERSON) Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 15 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44765
2026:CGHC:44765-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 336 of 2026 1 - Ankit Singh (In Person) S/o Mahendra Singh Aged About 30 Years R/o Gevra Project, Police Station Dipka, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh, Mo. No. 9340079572. 2 - Gautam Porte S/o Late Sohan Singh Porte Aged
CGHC010363992026
2026:CGHC:44765-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
REVP No. 336 of 2026
1 - Ankit Singh (In Person) S/o Mahendra Singh Aged About 30 Years R/o Gevra Project, Police Station Dipka, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh, Mo. No.
9340079572.
2 - Gautam Porte S/o Late Sohan Singh Porte Aged About 21 Years R/o Hardi Bazar, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh, Mo. No. 9329934984.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Inspector General Of Police Bilaspur Range, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4 - The Superintendent Of Police Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh.
5 - Station House Officer Police Station Deepka, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh.
6 - Station House Officer P.S. Hardi Bazar, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh.
7 - Axis Bank Limited Through Branch Manager, Deepka Branch, Katghora Road, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh.
8 - Regional Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ankit Singh and Mr. Gautam Porte,
petitioners-in-person.
For Respondent/State :
Mr. K. G. Yadav, Dy. Government Advocate.
For Respondent No. 8 :
Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate.
Page 1 of 2
Hon'ble Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, Judge Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge
16/10/2026
1. After arguing for some time, the petitioners-in-person seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present review petition with liberty to avail of the remedy available to them, as directed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.08.2026 passed in WPCR No. 480/2026.
2. The submissions made by the petitioners-in-person are not opposed by learned counsel for the opposite party.
3. In view of the submissions made by the petitioners-in-person, the present review petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Judge Alok
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…