Chhattisgarh High Court

MCRC/9360/2026 of JANAK LAL BANDHE Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 15 October 2026

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9360 of 2026 1 - Janak Lal Bandhe S/o Makhan Lal Bandhe, Aged About 35 Years R/o Chandkhuri, Police Station Pulgaon, Tehsil And, District - Durg C.G. ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S H O, Police Station -

CGHC010389932026

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

MCRC No. 9360 of 2026

1 - Janak Lal Bandhe S/o Makhan Lal Bandhe, Aged About 35 Years R/o Chandkhuri, Police Station Pulgaon, Tehsil And, District - Durg C.G.

... Applicant

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S H O, Police Station - Pulgaon, District Durg

C.G.

--- Non-applicant

For Applicant

: Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Advocate

For Non-applicant

: Mr. Akash Agrawal, PL

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 16.10.2026

1) The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, he has been arrested in connection with Crime No.628/2026 registered at Police Station Pulgaon, Durg (C.G.) for the offence under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

2) Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that police of Police Station Pulgaon has received a secret information from the informant and on the basis of said information, raid was conducted and seized 5.400

Page 1 of 3

bulk litre of country-made liquor from the possession of the present applicant. Thereafter, the aforesaid case was registered against the present applicant.

3) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant has falsely been implicated in the case and the alleged 5.400 bulk litre of country-made liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant has three stale criminal antecedents of a similar nature, registered in the years 2021 and 2024 but at present, no similar criminal case is pending against him. He would contend that the applicant is in jail since 11.07.2026; the charge-sheet has already been filed; and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable period of time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant.

4) On the other hand, the learned State counsel would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court. He would further submit that 5.400 bulk litre of country-made liquor was seized from the possession of the present applicant; therefore, he is not entitled to the grant of regular bail.

5) I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

6) Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the offence, the fact that the applicant has three stale criminal antecedents of a similar nature, registered in the years 2021 and 2024 and at present, no similar criminal case is pending against the present applicant, and further considering the quantity of

Page 2 of 3

liquor seized from the possession of the present applicant, charge- sheet has been filed before the competent Court, the applicant is in jail since 11.07.2026, and the conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

7) It is directed that in the event of the applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

(i) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court;

(ii) he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, &

(iii) he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. The observation made hereinabove is for the purpose of deciding this bail application only, the learned trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Rekha

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead