Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/972/2026 of NAWADHABAI Vs AARTI on 15 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 972 of 2026 1 - Nawadhabai D/o Heeralal Aged About 58 Years Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh. 2 - Daleshwari @ Dileshwari D/o Heeralal Aged About 65 Years Caste Satnami R/o Village
CGHC010398442026
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 972 of 2026 1 - Nawadhabai D/o Heeralal Aged About 58 Years Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh. 2 - Daleshwari @ Dileshwari D/o Heeralal Aged About 65 Years Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh. 3 - Vidya Bai D/o Heeralal Aged About 58 Years Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh. 4 - Padman Bai D/o Heeralal Aged About 47 Years Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh. 5 - Santoshibai D/o Heeralal Aged About 49 Years Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Aarti D/o Deendayal Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh. 2 - Savrin Bai W/o Deendayal Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mamta D/o Deendayal Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh. 4 - Anjali D/o Deendayal Caste Satnami R/o Village Jhumka, Tehsil Bhatgaon District Sarangarh, Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
Page 1 of 2
Order Sheet 16/10/2026
Shri Kaushal Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. The present MCC has been filed seeking restoration of WP227 No.984 of 2023 which got dismissed for want of prosecution on 26.09.2026. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that due to unavoidable circumstances he could not appear before the court when the matter was called on 26.09.2026 and the case was dismissed for want prosecution. He would further submit that the matter pertains to property right of the parties and the writ petition has been filed against the order passed by the Board of Revenue which requires adjudication on merit. Therefore, WP227 No.984 of 2023 may be restored to its original number. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the MCC stands allowed and WP227 No.984 of 2023 is restored to its original number. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Inder
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…