Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5348/2026 of GOKUL RAM SAHU (Proprietor of Radha Rice Mill) Vs UNION OF INDIA on 15 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44812
2026:CGHC:44812 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5348 of 2026 1 - Gokul Ram Sahu (Proprietor Of Radha Rice Mill) S/o Late Johan Ram, Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Lakhanpuri, Tehsil - Charama, District North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of
CGHC010415732026
2026:CGHC:44812
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5348 of 2026
1 - Gokul Ram Sahu (Proprietor Of Radha Rice Mill) S/o Late Johan Ram, Aged About 75 Years R/o Village Lakhanpuri, Tehsil - Charama, District North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Union Of India Through Deputy Secretary, Ministry Of Consumer Affairs, Food And Public Distribution Department Of Food And Public Distribution, Krishi Bhawan New Delhi.
2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur
(C.G.)
3 - Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
4 - C.G. State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Kanker, District Kanker
(C.G.)
Page 1 of 3
5 - Collector (Food Department), Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.)
6 - District Marketing Officer, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Kanker, Distt. Kanker (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Shri Nitesh Jain, Advocate
For Respondent No. 3 & 6
For Respondent No. 1
:
:
Shri Animesh Tiwari, Advocate
Ms. Shweta Rai, CGC on behalf of
Shri Ramakant Mishra, DSGI
Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 16/10/2026
1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026, an application seeking exemption from filing typed copies of the annexures.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not wish to press I.A. No. 01/2026, as the typed copies of the annexures have already been filed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the representations submitted by the petitioner.
Page 2 of 3
4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 3 and 6 submits that the petitioner's representation shall be decided within a stipulated period.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
6. Considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner, respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. It is further directed that the respondents shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner until the petitioner's representation is decided.
8. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Madhurima
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…