Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4370/2022 of IFTIKHAR AHMED SIDDIQUE Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 15 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44875
2026:CGHC:44875 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4370 of 2022 Iftikhar Ahmed Siddique S/o Asgar Safi Siddique, Aged About 68 Years R/o Ratakhar, Saket Nagar, Korba, Tahsil And, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The
CGHC010326132022
2026:CGHC:44875
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4370 of 2022
Iftikhar Ahmed Siddique S/o Asgar Safi Siddique, Aged About 68 Years R/o Ratakhar, Saket Nagar, Korba, Tahsil And, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2 - Santosh Kumar Singh Superintendent Of Police, Korba Chhattisgarh.
3 - Rupak Sharan, Town Inspector Police Station Kotwali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 4 - Naval Sao, Sub-Inspector, Police Help Center, C.S.E.B., Police Station Kotwali, Korba Chahttisgarh.
5 - Jai Prakash Yadav, Police Constable, Police Help Center, C.S.E.B., Police Station Kotwali, Korba Chhattisgarh.
6 - Dilip Jha, Head Constable, Police Help Center, C.S.E.B., Police Station Kotwali, Korba Chhattisgarh.
7 - Ramesh Chopra S/o Tilak Raj Chopra, Aged About 74 Years R/o Sharda Vihar, Korba Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate
For State
: Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 16.10.2026
1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, despite repeated efforts, he has not received any instructions from the petitioner for a considerable period of time. In the absence of
Page 1 of 2
necessary instructions from the petitioner, learned counsel submits that he is unable to effectively assist the Court or advance submissions on behalf of the petitioner in support of the writ petition.
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and considering that there are no instructions from the petitioner to proceed with the matter, this Court finds itself unable to adjudicate upon the grievance raised in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions.
Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Yogesh
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…