Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5292/2026 of IPLAL CHOUDHRI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 14 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44601 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5292 of 2026 1 - Iplal Choudhri S/o Hemprasad Aged About 84 Years 2 - Padmlochan S/o Deenanath Aged About 43 Years 3 - Yamuna Prasad Choudhry S/o Manohar Lal Aged About 49 Years 4 - Chandrika Prasad Choudhry S/o
CGHC010405252026
2026:CGHC:44601
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5292 of 2026
1 - Iplal Choudhri S/o Hemprasad Aged About 84 Years 2 - Padmlochan S/o Deenanath Aged About 43 Years 3 - Yamuna Prasad Choudhry S/o Manohar Lal Aged About 49 Years 4 - Chandrika Prasad Choudhry S/o Hemprasad Choudhry Aged About 72
Years
All are R/o Village Bayang, Tahsil And District - Raigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioners
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur
(C.G.)
2 - Secretary Public Work Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Collector Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.)
4 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Cum Land Acquisition Officer Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.)
5 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department, (B/R) Division - Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.)
... Respondents
For Petitioners
:
Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate
For State
:
Mr. Anmol Sharma, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
15/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioners, in this Writ Petition, have prayed for the following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents for initiating acquisition proceeding as per Act, 2013 and concluding the same within a period of 3 months or any stipulated time. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authorities for granting benefit Under Section 30(3) and 80 of Act, 2013. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a better petition by annexing the relevant documents necessary for adjudication of the case.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, this Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge
Priyanka