Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/7562/2026 of AYODHYA BAHADUR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 14 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44584 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7562 of 2026 Ayodhya Bahadur S/o Shri Ram Bahadur Aged About 62 Years R/o. Gadhel Para, Ward No. 18, Baikunthpur, Post Office - Baikunthpur, District - Koriya (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh
CGHC010409412026
2026:CGHC:44584
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 7562 of 2026
Ayodhya Bahadur S/o Shri Ram Bahadur Aged About 62 Years R/o.
Gadhel Para, Ward No. 18, Baikunthpur, Post Office - Baikunthpur, District - Koriya (C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 – Engineer-In-Chief, Department Of Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.) Atal Nagar, Sector 19, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.) Zone - Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4 - Superintendent Engineer, Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.), Ambikapur, Circle-Ambikapur, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh.
5 - Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering (P.H.E.) Department Division Baikunthpur, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
6 - Divisional Joint Director, Treasury Accounts And Pensions Ambikapur Circle, Sarguja, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh.
7 - Treasury Officer, District Treasury Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Akash Shrivastava, Advocate
For Respondents/ State : Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU)
Order on Board
15/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking for issuance of an appropriate direction to the Respondent authorities for considering the claim of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work- Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977.
2. According to the Petitioner, he has made his claim in the light of the recent decision passed by this Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023.
3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claim of similarly placed person herein in the light of the aforesaid decision passed by this Court on the same subject- matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU)
JUDGE $. Bhilwar