Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/3916/2021 of MAA SHARDA MAHILA SWA SAHAYTA SAMUH Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 14 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3916 of 2021 Maa Sharda Mahila Swa Sahayta Samuh Through Its President Smt. Prabha Soni, W/o Shri Chandrakant Soni, A /o 49 Years, R/o Raipur Road, Bus Stand Chowk, Sambalpur, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ...
CGHC010247952021
2026:CGHC:44609
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 3916 of 2021
Maa Sharda Mahila Swa Sahayta Samuh Through Its President Smt.
Prabha Soni, W/o Shri Chandrakant Soni, A/o 49 Years, R/o Raipur Road, Bus Stand Chowk, Sambalpur, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Women And Child Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The District Programme Officer Women And Child Development Department, Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 4 - The Project Officer Integrated Child Development Scheme, Project Navagarh, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 5 - Jay Ambe Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Through Its President, Sector Sambalpur, Project Navagarh District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 6 - The District Collector Bemetara District Bemetara Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS system)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Atul Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate
For State
: Mr. Priyank Rathi, GA
Digitally
signed by
AMIT PATEL
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed this petition with the following reliefs:- “ 10.1 To issue the writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ setting aside impugned selection order dated 06.09.2021 (Annexure P/15) by declaring the same to be illegal and the respondent may be directed to select the petitioner in the said process. 10.2 To provide compensation and cost of the petition to the petitioner. 10.3 To Pass any other order as it may deem fit, in the interest of justice.”
2. The petitioner has challenged the allotment made in favour of Jay Ambe Mahila Sewa Sahayata Samuh, Jaitpuri, vide order dated 06.09.2021. However, the said allotment was for a period of three years, which has since expired by efflux of time. Consequently, the challenge to the said allotment has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL