Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/5249/2026 of HARISH SHUKLA Vs ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. on 14 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44685 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5249 of 2026 1 - Harish Shukla S/o Amarnath Shukla Aged About 47 Years R/o H.No. 1734, Ward No. 12, Bajrang Chowk, Kanji House Kumhari, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Poonam Shukla W/o Harish Shukla Aged About 46
CGHC010382972026
2026:CGHC:44685
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 5249 of 2026
1 - Harish Shukla S/o Amarnath Shukla Aged About 47 Years R/o H.No.
1734, Ward No. 12, Bajrang Chowk, Kanji House Kumhari, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Smt. Poonam Shukla W/o Harish Shukla Aged About 46 Years R/o H.No. 1734, Ward No. 12, Bajrang Chowk, Kanji House Kumhari, Distt.
Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Through Its Authorized Officer, The Ruby, 10th Floor 29, Senapati Bapat Marg Dadar (W) Mumbai 400028.
2 - Tahsildar Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. G.A.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RAGHVENDRA
JAT
Digitally
signed by
RAGHVENDRA
JAT
15/10/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for records pertaining to the case of the petitioners. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the possession notice dated 18/11/2025, issued by the respondent no.1 under Section 13 (4) of the Act, 2002. 10.3 Any other consequential relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper and for which the petitioners is entitled, may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest of justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
3. No objection has been raised from other side.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge
Raghu Jat