Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4602/2021 of M/s SHANKARA ENTERPRISES Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 14 October 2026
2026:CGHC:44618
2026:CGHC:44618 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4602 of 2021 1 - M/s Shankara Enterprises Through Partner Harihar Upadhyay, S/o Late Shri Parmanand Upadhyay, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Main Road Sarafa Line, Kawardha, P.S. Kawardha, District Kawardha (Chhattisgarh),
CGHC010289892021
2026:CGHC:44618
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4602 of 2021
1 - M/s Shankara Enterprises Through Partner Harihar Upadhyay, S/o Late Shri Parmanand Upadhyay, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Main Road Sarafa Line, Kawardha, P.S. Kawardha, District Kawardha (Chhattisgarh), District :
Kawardha (Kabirdham), (C.G.)
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Women And Child Development And Health Care Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, (C.G.).
2 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd., National Health Mission, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, (C.G.).
3 - The Superintending Engineer, Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd., District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, (C.G.)
4 - The Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Ltd., Raipur Division District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, (C.G.)
... Respondents
(Cause title is downloaded from CIS Periphery.)
For Petitioner
: Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate.
For State
: Ms. Akanksha Verma, P.L. for the State.
For Respondents No. 02 to 04 : Mr. Trivikram Nayak, Advocate.
Page 1 of 2
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15.10.2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents, submit that, upon perusal of the documents on record, it is evident that a sum of Rs. 36,50,546/- (Rupees Thirty Six Lakhs Fifty Thousand Five Hundred and Forty Six only) has already been paid to the petitioner. Consequently, the grievance raised in the present petition stands redressed, and the petition has, therefore, been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, they jointly pray that the present petition be disposed of as having become infructuous.
2. In view of the aforesaid submissions and considering the fact that the amount of Rs. 36, 50, 546/- has already been paid to the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…